Box Office: 'Star Trek Beyond' Beams Up $59.6M, Ice Age Flops. The future of the Star Trek film franchise is in doubt after the disappointing performance of Star Trek Beyond at the box office. Photos. But, it is logical the classification of “Star Trek Beyond” as a “Box Office Flop”. But he doesn't get on Reddit or go to Star Trek sites, etc. I have a friend who is a huge Star Trek fan. Paramount is continuing that trend by naming this movie Star Trek Beyond, which is actually somehow worse. By the positive and admirable factors, congratulations to the stars and the creative team in front and behind the cameras. “Now You See Me 2” did a bit less, but its huge overseas returns led by China has gotten it … Star Trek Beyond (Paramount) Week 2 ... and that was an expensive flop. Or they might just throw everything at it for one final box office blowout. Star Trek Beyond begins with the Enterprise and it's crew on a five year research mission in uncharted space which was assigned to them at the end of the previous movie. Justin Lin's Star Trek Beyond beamed up a strong $59.6 million from almost 4,000 theaters in North America. But that yielded the only one of the Star Trek TV spinoffs to fail in the marketplace, one hit movie, one hit movie that was not as well received, and one box-office flop. Isn't Star Trek Beyond about discovery and adventure though as they go into uncharted space and discover a new planet? It was easily the best of the three reboot movies, there was no lens flare and the story was, for the most part, pretty solid. The final result was Star Trek Into Darkness, which was the dumbest name ever. Last night I was telling him about the recent DSC revelations and told him I went to see Beyond. Then, for the sequel to 2009's Star Trek reboot, somebody thought "hey, let's get rid of the subtitles and just make a terrible play on the phrasing of Star Trek!" He has seen all of the movies, as well every episode of every series, multiple times. See all photos. Beyond is a flop unless China pulls in a cool hundred million and then it falls into just “disappointing” territory. So, $13 million profit except … The Ghostbusters reboot that premiered one weekend earlier than Star Trek Beyond had a production budget of $144 million, but the studio is estimating that it will … With the franchise teetering on the edge after the box office flop that was 2016's Star Trek Beyond, and with fans decidedly underwhelmed by what that flick had to … But a bigger flop than Ghostbusters? He said, "What is Star Trek Beyond?" ... it turned out to be a solid trek film. "Star Trek Beyond's" solid box office debut proves that there's still life in one of Hollywood's most durable franchises. The reviews were great, Rotten Tomatoes even certified it Fresh. As of Thursday night, Box Office Mojo has it at $198.2 million. Nah. Star Trek Beyond could still break even and the studio already have the fourth film in the works. "Star Trek" has already been greenlit for a fourth movie, but "Beyond" must resonate at the foreign box office to justify the decision. With a marketing campaign that sung its credentials from all angles, Star Trek Beyond looked like a total, sure fire hit. “Star Trek Beyond” is supposed to be based on “Star Trek” created by Gene Roddenberry. ... Star Trek Beyond, A Bigger Flop Than Ghostbusters 2016? its possible the large home sales of the first 2 films may have been why star trek beyond was made (according to the number.com, the first one had 189 million in home media sales so if the theatrical didn't break even or only just broke even then the home media would have ensured it was a profitable film). Star Trek Beyond (2016) ... box office, & company info Videos. It looks like they really need to up their game if they're going to rescue this franchise though.