Securing command of the commons in the face of increasing cyber operations by China and Russia requires a policy framework that accelerates cyber offense. Offensive cyber operations often must go through third country networks, and there is a risk they can do damage along the way. Resolved: The benefits of the United States federal government’s use of offensive cyber operations outweigh the harms. The United States, the United Kingdom and Australia have declared that they have used offensive cyber operations against Islamic State, 1 but some smaller nations, such as the Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden and Greece, are also relatively transparent about the fact that they have offensive cyber capabilities. Resolved: The benefits of the United States federal government’s use of offensive cyber operations outweigh the harms. The shift is happening now, as the markets grow, threats increase, players change, and we all are being affected. U.S. offensive cyber operations against North Korean military intelligence are significant. Deploying artificial intelligence in US cybersecurity efforts produces more benefits than harms. Resolved: The benefits of the United States federal government’s use of offensive cyber operations outweigh the harms. The Department of Defense Cyber Strategy, released in an unclassified summary this week, reiterates the proactive use of offensive cyber capabilities. An IGL [Intelligence Gain/Loss] assessment is required prior to executing a CO to the maximum extent practicable.” In any event, offensive cyber operations are to be used discriminatingly. admin; October 1, 2019; Table of Contents Definitions Three Types of Cyber Security (2019). The United States federal government should ban its offensive cyber operations. This reveals an uneasy situation within cyber cooperation: Allies do not agree on the appropriate procedures and boundaries for offensive cyber operations. Michael Sulmeyer is Director of the Cyber Security Project at the Harvard Kennedy School's Belfer Center. Profound effects are pushing fundamental changes to the engine which drives the industry. The state of cyber actors across the globe mandates vigilant and capable defensive cyber activities both nationally and in active theaters of operations. Not only is this topic awful, it’s also impossible to debate because the civilian population has no way of knowing what U.S. offensive cyber operations … The United States should replace means-tested welfare programs with a universal basic income. What offensive cyber operations and what harm are you referring to? Their argument is morally reprehensible. The rise in offensive cyber security will cause major shifts in traditional threat and protection strategies. More specifically, there is no agreement on when military cyber organizations can gain access to systems and networks in allied territory to disrupt adversarial activity. The U.S. vows to go on offense against cyber attackers. But experts say this is not a major change - it just applies conventional policy on conflict and espionage to the online world. The Con has no alternative to development led by China and the BRI, so their argument is literally that people in the developing world should stay poor and suffer an early death in order to avoid a marginal increase in coal consumption relative to the developed world where wealthy people live in air conditioned spaces and jet set around the world. This two-part series has attempted to clarify the international legal basis for U.S. offensive cyber operations in response to economic cyber intrusions. Proceedings of a Workshop on Deterring Cyberattacks: Informing Strategies and Developing Options for U.S. Policy (2010) Chapter: Categorizing and Understanding Offensive Cyber Capabilities and Their Use--Gregory Rattray and Jason Healey Not only that, but US cyberspace operations “could potentially compromise intelligence collection activities.