Daniel’s wisdom makes him a legend in his own time. God cares for His people, and gives them a set of prophecies that point to the events that come in later days. The fourth man looks like a son of the gods [C a divine figure].” GNV And he answered, and said, Lo, I see four men loose, walking in the midst of the fire, and they … Daniel is a son of David mentioned at 1 Chronicles 3:1. And again, not even daniel knew who Jesus is. Daniel 3:25 "and the form of the fourth is like the Son of God." According to Albert Barnes in his Notes on the Bible , "That this was the Son of God - the second person of the Trinity, who afterward became incarnate, has been quite a common opinion of expositors. That title comes from Daniel 7:13, which speaks of a heavenly figure. If the Hebrew plural MyIhølTa, the overwhelming majority of the time, “God” rather than “gods,” one must at least allow for the possibility that the Aramaic plural To call the majestic figure that miraculously showed up a “son of the gods”, would make sense. (Daniel 3:25). Nebuchadnezzar had cast the 3 Jews into the furnace for refusing to worship Neb's idol, so it's hardly likely he woulda known who the Son of the real God is. While it is recognized that the Aramaic word could mean either "gods" or "God" (context determines whether it is singular or plural in English), several commentaries share this view that the "polytheistic" king of Babylon would have conceived of the figure as a son of the "gods", plural, and not as "God", singular. There is no question in the minds of Bible believers who this Person is. r/KJVTruth: r/KJVTruth is a subreddit dedicated to providing evidence that the King James Version of the Bible is the inspired word of God and … Through Daniel, God promises a full restoration of Israel. It is possible that word of the Hebrew God had reached the king through Daniel or someone else. I recently engaged a coupla KJVOs over an old KJVO thingie...they insist the KJV is absolutely right to say "Son of God" in Daniel 3;25, while the Hebrew(and most MVs) actually says 'a son of the gods' and common sense supports that reading. The author of the Book of Daniel appears to have taken this legendary figure, renowned for his wisdom, to serve as his central human character. Hebrew(and most MVs) actually says 'a son of the gods' and common sense supports that reading. First, the equivalent Hebrew plural to the Aramaic Ny`IhDlTa of Daniel 3:25 is MyIhølTa, the plural noun regularly and overwhelmingly used for the singular true God, Jehovah. Daniel’s visions show God’s faithfulness to His people. When Nebuchadnezzar’s son sees a terrifying vision, his mother refers him to Daniel. Daniel’s prophecies cover a broad range of human history, as he predicted the rise and fall of the Greek and Roman Empires and the rise of a powerful king who “will do as he pleases. Daniel's companions Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego refuse to bow to King Nebuchadnezzar's golden statue and are thrown into a fiery furnace. Ezra 8:2 mentions a priest named Daniel who went from Babylon to Jerusalem with Ezra. Apparently the understanding of "Son of God" in Daniel 3:25 long precedes the publication of the King James Bible in 1611. This is how she describes him: [Daniel] was found to have insight and intelligence and wisdom like that of the gods. If the Hebrew plural MyIhølTa, the overwhelming majority of the time, “God” rather than “gods,” one must at least allow for the possibility that the Aramaic plural When the God fearing Hebrew children, Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego refused to bow down and worship before the image king Nebuchadnezzar made, he had them cast into a burning fiery furnace.